Free Lsat Practice Test (Editor's Choice)

(A) recycling plastic is never beneficial for the environment (B) the belief that recycling saves energy is not fully supported by the evidence (C) scientists should stop studying the energy costs of recycling (D) manufacturing new plastic from raw materials uses no energy at all (E) collecting and sorting plastics is the only energy-intensive step in recycling (B) — the belief that recycling saves energy is not fully supported by the evidence. (The argument shows the studies omitted key energy costs, so the belief is not fully supported.) Want more questions (Logic Games, Reading Comp) or a link to a free full official practice test ?

Which one of the following most logically completes the argument? Free LSAT Practice Test

For a full-length free test, I recommend (free with LSAC LawHub account) or Khan Academy’s official LSAT prep . Logical Reasoning Sample Question Directions: The following question presents a short argument. Select the answer choice that most logically completes the argument or best answers the question. (A) recycling plastic is never beneficial for the

Environmentalist: Many scientists believe that recycling plastic saves energy compared to producing new plastic from raw materials. However, this belief is based on studies that only consider energy used in manufacturing and transportation. Those studies ignore the energy spent collecting, sorting, and cleaning recyclable plastics. When these additional energy costs are included, recycling plastic often requires more energy than producing new plastic. Therefore, ______. For a full-length free test, I recommend (free